AIDU-STRAT-301
Delivery Type: Live, instructor-led Remote or In person
Prerequisite: AI Foundations for Professionals
This course provides professionals with a rigorous, non-technical framework for designing and governing enterprise AI strategy in real organizational environments. It focuses on how organizations decide where AI belongs, how it should be adopted, and why many AI initiatives fail despite strong technology or vendor promises.
Participants learn to treat AI adoption as an organizational transformation problem rather than a tooling decision. The course emphasizes system-level thinking, examining AI maturity, incentive alignment, ownership, governance, and evaluation frameworks that determine whether AI creates durable value or quietly fails.
Rather than promoting blanket automation, the course builds disciplined mental models for decision-making around buy versus build versus partner tradeoffs, vendor dependency risks, readiness gaps, and human factors that shape adoption outcomes. The focus is on long-term operational reality, not short-term experimentation.
Core Topics:
Enterprise AI as a strategic capability
AI maturity models and readiness assessment
From pilots to production reality
Buy vs build vs partner decisions
Vendor evaluation and dependency risk
Organizational readiness and capability gaps
Adoption barriers and common failure modes
Governance, ownership, and accountability
Measuring strategic impact and real value
Use case selection and prioritization
Change management and human factors
Where enterprise AI adds value and where it does not
Outcomes:
Explain what enterprise AI strategy is and why failures are often strategic
Assess organizational AI maturity beyond vendor narratives
Distinguish experimentation, adoption, and transformation phases
Evaluate buy vs build vs partner decisions systematically
Identify governance, incentive, and ownership gaps
Critically assess AI vendor claims and lock-in risks
Design an AI adoption roadmap aligned with business value and risk tolerance
Recognize when AI should not be adopted despite technical feasibility